Triple
T21483733
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cooperative Management and Protection Areas |
E530061
|
entity |
| Predicate | planningTool |
P99834
|
FINISHED |
| Object | resource management plans |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: resource management plans | Statement: [Cooperative Management and Protection Areas, planningTool, resource management plans]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: planningTool Context triple: [Cooperative Management and Protection Areas, planningTool, resource management plans]
-
A.
managementPlanningTool
chosen
Indicates that an entity is a tool or system used to support, organize, or execute management planning activities for another entity or process.
-
B.
planningSkill
Indicates the degree to which an entity is capable of effectively organizing, sequencing, and coordinating actions or resources to achieve goals.
-
C.
planner
Indicates that an entity is responsible for organizing, scheduling, or coordinating activities, tasks, or resources.
-
D.
planningChallenge
Indicates a situation where creating, organizing, or coordinating a plan is difficult or problematic for the involved entities.
-
E.
plannedWith
Indicates that an entity created or arranged a plan in collaboration or coordination with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c45acc3881908e38d3f28964152b |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e9ea35945481909e5982429962de39 |
completed | April 23, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e631ec1d048190b6da97da8222e413 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:21 p.m.