Triple

T21479364
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wik peoples E529946 entity
Predicate involvedIn P149 FINISHED
Object Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996) High Court case — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996) High Court case | Statement: [Wik peoples, involvedIn, Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996) High Court case]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996) High Court case
Context triple: [Wik peoples, involvedIn, Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996) High Court case]
  • A. Wik Peoples v Queensland chosen
    Wik Peoples v Queensland is a landmark 1996 High Court of Australia case that held native title rights could coexist with pastoral leases, significantly shaping Australian land and Indigenous rights law.
  • B. Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
    Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
  • C. Dunghutti People v Commonwealth of Australia (native title case)
    Dunghutti People v Commonwealth of Australia is a landmark Australian native title case in which the Dunghutti people secured one of the first formal recognitions of Indigenous land rights on the New South Wales mainland.
  • D. Banjima People v State of Western Australia (2013)
    Banjima People v State of Western Australia (2013) is a landmark Federal Court decision that formally recognized the Banjima people’s native title rights over a large area of land in Western Australia’s Pilbara region.
  • E. High Court case Kartinyeri v Commonwealth
    Kartinyeri v Commonwealth was a landmark 1998 High Court of Australia case that examined the scope of the federal Parliament’s power to make race-based laws under the Constitution, particularly in the context of Indigenous heritage protection.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c45acc3881908e38d3f28964152b completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e9ea1a37a88190845810cbcacbad65 completed April 23, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:20 p.m.