Triple
T21477944
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kashmir division |
E529911
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTown |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Baramulla |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Baramulla | Statement: [Kashmir division, hasTown, Baramulla]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Baramulla Context triple: [Kashmir division, hasTown, Baramulla]
-
A.
Baramulla
chosen
Baramulla is a town in the Indian union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, known as a historic gateway to the Kashmir Valley and an important settlement along the Jhelum River.
-
B.
Udhampur
Udhampur is a town in the Indian union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, known for its strategic military importance and location in the Himalayan foothills.
-
C.
Mansehra
Mansehra is a major city in northern Pakistan known as a gateway to the Kaghan Valley and the Karakoram Highway.
-
D.
Barwala
Barwala is a prominent town in the Hisar district of Haryana, India, known as a local commercial and administrative center for surrounding rural areas.
-
E.
Barwala
Barwala is a town in the Indian state of Gujarat, known as a local administrative and commercial center within the Ahmedabad region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c459acb481909bb6ee452a0045c7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e9ea1951fc8190910f634327aa5c3f |
completed | April 23, 2026, 9:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:20 p.m.