Triple

T21475894
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Appeals Division E529859 entity
Predicate legalBasis P125 FINISHED
Object Rome Statute Article 81 — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rome Statute Article 81 | Statement: [Appeals Division, legalBasis, Rome Statute Article 81]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Rome Statute Article 81
Context triple: [Appeals Division, legalBasis, Rome Statute Article 81]
  • A. Rome Statute Article 67
    Rome Statute Article 67 is the provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that sets out the fundamental fair trial rights and minimum guarantees afforded to accused persons in proceedings before the Court.
  • B. Rome Statute Article 113
    Rome Statute Article 113 is a provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that addresses the temporal application and interpretation of the Statute’s procedural rules.
  • C. Rome Statute Article 64
    Rome Statute Article 64 is the provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that sets out the powers, functions, and conduct of trial proceedings before the Court’s Trial Division.
  • D. Rome Statute Article 111
    Rome Statute Article 111 is a provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that governs the enforcement of fines and forfeiture measures imposed by the Court.
  • E. Rome Statute Article 74
    Rome Statute Article 74 is the provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that sets out the rules and standards governing how Trial Chambers deliberate and issue their judgments.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Rome Statute Article 81
Target entity description: Rome Statute Article 81 is the provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that governs the procedures and grounds for appealing convictions, acquittals, and sentences.
  • A. Rome Statute Article 67
    Rome Statute Article 67 is the provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that sets out the fundamental fair trial rights and minimum guarantees afforded to accused persons in proceedings before the Court.
  • B. Rome Statute Article 113
    Rome Statute Article 113 is a provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that addresses the temporal application and interpretation of the Statute’s procedural rules.
  • C. Rome Statute Article 64
    Rome Statute Article 64 is the provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that sets out the powers, functions, and conduct of trial proceedings before the Court’s Trial Division.
  • D. Rome Statute Article 111
    Rome Statute Article 111 is a provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that governs the enforcement of fines and forfeiture measures imposed by the Court.
  • E. Rome Statute Article 74
    Rome Statute Article 74 is the provision of the International Criminal Court’s founding treaty that sets out the rules and standards governing how Trial Chambers deliberate and issue their judgments.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c459acb481909bb6ee452a0045c7 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e9ea1737f881908ef7889e9568a4d3 completed April 23, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:20 p.m.