Triple

T21474294
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PHI E529812 entity
Predicate scopeOfSignificance P25607 FINISHED
Object local historical significance LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local historical significance | Statement: [PHI, scopeOfSignificance, local historical significance]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: scopeOfSignificance
Context triple: [PHI, scopeOfSignificance, local historical significance]
  • A. scopeOfContribution
    Indicates the specific area, domain, or extent within which an entity’s contribution or involvement applies.
  • B. typeOfSignificance
    Indicates that one entity specifies the nature or category of importance, relevance, or significance that another entity possesses.
  • C. fieldOfSignificance
    Indicates that something holds particular importance, relevance, or impact within a specified domain, context, or area of interest.
  • D. scopeType chosen
    Indicates the specific range, level, or context within which a given relationship, rule, or action is defined or applies.
  • E. significance
    Indicates that one entity holds particular importance, influence, or meaningful impact in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c459acb481909bb6ee452a0045c7 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e9ea1650788190bd55ebdbf1dfc46f completed April 23, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e631ec1d048190b6da97da8222e413 completed April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:19 p.m.