Triple

T21467057
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mitsubishi aircraft design bureau E529618 entity
Predicate designedType P143050 FINISHED
Object carrier-based fighters LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: carrier-based fighters | Statement: [Mitsubishi aircraft design bureau, designedType, carrier-based fighters]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designedType
Context triple: [Mitsubishi aircraft design bureau, designedType, carrier-based fighters]
  • A. designedStructureType
    Indicates the type or category of structure that something has been specifically designed to be.
  • B. isDesignedAs
    Indicates that something has been intentionally created or configured to serve as or function in the role of something else.
  • C. designerType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of designer role associated with an entity.
  • D. designedWith
    Indicates that one entity was created, planned, or developed using another entity as a tool, method, or guiding basis in its design process.
  • E. productTypeDesigned chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the type or category of product for which another entity has been specifically designed.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c458133481908ae8b41a12c4edec completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e9e9f415d48190a2b0993a4f3c018f completed April 23, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e631ec1d048190b6da97da8222e413 completed April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:13 p.m.