Triple

T21456863
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Baz E529363 entity
Predicate associatedWithKeepingRole P144417 FINISHED
Object wicket-keeper LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: wicket-keeper | Statement: [Baz, associatedWithKeepingRole, wicket-keeper]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithKeepingRole
Context triple: [Baz, associatedWithKeepingRole, wicket-keeper]
  • A. associatedWithTitleHolderRole
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is connected to, or linked with, a role held by a title holder.
  • B. associatedWithUnitRole
    Indicates that an entity has a connection or linkage to a specific role within a particular unit or organizational subdivision.
  • C. associatedWithRoleOfNameBearer
    Indicates that an entity is connected to or involved with the specific role or function held by a designated name bearer.
  • D. roleWith
    Indicates that one entity holds or performs a particular role in relation to another entity.
  • E. associatedWithRule
    Indicates that an entity is linked or connected to a specific rule, such as being governed, constrained, or defined by that rule.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c458133481908ae8b41a12c4edec completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e9e9d7af248190a3bc06a390f390bf completed April 23, 2026, 9:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e631df1b38819088d3604854e697b4 completed April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e63d2aca38819094d312078feaa436 completed April 20, 2026, 2:50 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:08 p.m.