Triple
T21440436
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nuthin' Fancy |
E528925
|
entity |
| Predicate | featuresMusician |
P20942
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ed King |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ed King | Statement: [Nuthin' Fancy, featuresMusician, Ed King]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ed King Context triple: [Nuthin' Fancy, featuresMusician, Ed King]
-
A.
Ed King
chosen
Ed King was an American rock guitarist and songwriter best known as a member of Lynyrd Skynyrd, co-writing hits like "Sweet Home Alabama."
-
B.
Joe King
Joe King is an American musician best known as the guitarist and co-founder of the rock band The Fray.
-
C.
Joe King
Joe King was an American actor active in early 20th-century cinema, appearing in numerous films during the silent and early sound eras.
-
D.
Jonathan King
Jonathan King is a film producer best known for his work on the biographical legal drama "On the Basis of Sex," which chronicles Ruth Bader Ginsburg's early career.
-
E.
Jonathan King
Jonathan King is a British singer-songwriter, record producer, and former music industry figure known for his 1960s pop hits and later controversial legal troubles.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c4569fa081908101baa24f8745db |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e8b700237c8190bbcb4bedc4242719 |
completed | April 22, 2026, 11:54 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:05 p.m.