Triple
T21427622
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Antara |
E528597
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTonalOrganization |
P67730
|
FINISHED |
| Object | non‑tonal or post‑tonal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: non‑tonal or post‑tonal | Statement: [Antara, hasTonalOrganization, non‑tonal or post‑tonal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTonalOrganization Context triple: [Antara, hasTonalOrganization, non‑tonal or post‑tonal]
-
A.
hasPhonemicTone
Indicates that a language, word, or syllable uses pitch differences (tones) as phonemic contrasts that can change meaning.
-
B.
tonal
chosen
Indicates that one entity has a tone, pitch pattern, or tonal quality in relation to another (such as a language, sound, or musical element).
-
C.
tonalCharacteristic
Indicates the specific quality or character of a sound’s tone, such as its color, texture, or expressive nuance, in relation to an entity.
-
D.
tonalAssociation
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to another through a shared or corresponding tonal quality, pitch, or key.
-
E.
inTonality
Indicates that something (such as a musical element, passage, or piece) is expressed, structured, or interpreted within a specific musical key or tonal framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c455f3688190810bc96365791b0f |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e8b3e63a54819089efea2f26b58107 |
completed | April 22, 2026, 11:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e61639ee288190889ffd500d1260f6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 5:49 p.m.