Triple
T21409560
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lord Stirling |
E528130
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusOfTitleClaim |
P142304
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not recognized by the British House of Lords |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not recognized by the British House of Lords | Statement: [Lord Stirling, legalStatusOfTitleClaim, not recognized by the British House of Lords]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusOfTitleClaim Context triple: [Lord Stirling, legalStatusOfTitleClaim, not recognized by the British House of Lords]
-
A.
legalStatusOfClaims
chosen
Indicates the current legal standing or condition of specific claims within a legal or administrative context.
-
B.
hasTitleInLaw
Indicates that an entity holds or is designated by a specific formal title as defined or recognized in law.
-
C.
legalStatusInPlot
Indicates the legal standing or rights an entity holds within the context of a specific plot or storyline.
-
D.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
-
E.
legalCodeStatus
Indicates the legal or regulatory status assigned to a specific code within a legal or statutory system (e.g., active, repealed, pending).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c454c248819093425d1099101c09 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e8b1b40eb48190ae03532de9841cba |
completed | April 22, 2026, 11:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e61633f8208190a2a849457c4e4198 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 5:41 p.m.