Triple

T21408054
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject George L. Hanbury II E528091 entity
Predicate familyName P18 FINISHED
Object Hanbury NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hanbury | Statement: [George L. Hanbury II, familyName, Hanbury]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hanbury
Context triple: [George L. Hanbury II, familyName, Hanbury]
  • A. Hanbury chosen
    Hanbury is a historic English village known for its early medieval religious significance and association with the cult of Saint Werburgh.
  • B. Horbury
    Horbury is a town in West Yorkshire, England, historically part of the Wakefield area and known for its industrial heritage and parish church.
  • C. Henbury
    Henbury is a small settlement within the civil parish of Sturminster Marshall in Dorset, England.
  • D. Hanborough
    Hanborough is a civil parish in West Oxfordshire, England, encompassing the villages of Long Hanborough and Church Hanborough.
  • E. Oldbury
    Oldbury is a town in the West Midlands of England that serves as the administrative centre of the Metropolitan Borough of Sandwell.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b520ee3c8190abddbee7e37e834c completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e8b1b25fa48190a968f482beb8377a completed April 22, 2026, 11:32 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 5:32 p.m.