Triple

T21391162
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fabius, Alabama E527651 entity
Predicate isSubjectToCountyRegulation P43654 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Fabius, Alabama, isSubjectToCountyRegulation, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isSubjectToCountyRegulation
Context triple: [Fabius, Alabama, isSubjectToCountyRegulation, true]
  • A. isSubjectToCountyGovernment chosen
    Indicates that an entity falls under the jurisdiction, authority, or administrative control of a county-level government.
  • B. subjectToRegulation
    Indicates that an entity is governed, constrained, or controlled by a specific rule, law, or regulatory framework.
  • C. isInCountyClass
    Indicates that one entity (such as a place or institution) belongs to, or is categorized within, a particular county classification.
  • D. isInCountySeatJurisdiction
    Indicates that one entity falls under the legal or administrative authority of the county seat associated with another entity.
  • E. isInCountySubdivision
    Indicates that one entity (typically a place or address) is located within the boundaries of a specific county subdivision.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b51ff3748190935c0a513c62a12b completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e8b113690c81909c0a378fddba5d3a completed April 22, 2026, 11:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6162bbfc88190a3e75859941b2638 completed April 20, 2026, 12:03 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 5:13 p.m.