Triple
T2135290
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Van der Koop |
E46637
|
entity |
| Predicate | isWrittenWithSpace |
P36966
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Van der Koop, isWrittenWithSpace, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isWrittenWithSpace Context triple: [Van der Koop, isWrittenWithSpace, true]
-
A.
canBeWrittenIn
Indicates that something is capable of being expressed, encoded, or represented using a particular language, notation, or medium.
-
B.
hasWrittenForm
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific written or textual representation.
-
C.
areWrittenOn
Indicates that one entity serves as a surface or medium on which another entity is inscribed, recorded, or written.
-
D.
writtenIn
Indicates that a work (such as a text, program, or document) is expressed or encoded using a particular language or notation.
-
E.
hasWrittenFor
Indicates that one entity has created written content (such as articles, stories, or texts) for or on behalf of another entity, typically a publication, organization, or platform.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a174ab48190a5db20c132e5dccf |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbf74147c81908793c3694894f94a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbd96a3b0819081efbfef975e1513 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abbf71edf08190add69022aabfd49d |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:02 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.