Triple
T21332962
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Barngarla people |
E525959
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEthnonymVariant |
P57538
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pangkala |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pangkala | Statement: [Barngarla people, hasEthnonymVariant, Pangkala]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pangkala Context triple: [Barngarla people, hasEthnonymVariant, Pangkala]
-
A.
Pangkarla
Pangkarla is an alternative ethnonym for the Barngarla, an Aboriginal Australian people traditionally associated with parts of South Australia.
-
B.
Pinnau
The Pinnau is a river in northern Germany that flows through the district of Pinneberg in the state of Schleswig-Holstein before emptying into the Elbe.
-
C.
Pangwali
Pangwali is an Indo-Aryan language variety spoken primarily in the Pangi Valley of Himachal Pradesh, India, and is considered a dialect of the Western Pahari group.
-
D.
Pangkara
chosen
Pangkara is an alternative ethnonym used to refer to the Barngarla, an Aboriginal Australian people traditionally associated with parts of South Australia.
-
E.
Pangai
Pangai is the main administrative and population center of the Haʻapai island group in the Kingdom of Tonga.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b51b90788190a4dd823d962626da |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ee5ba65c4081908b93d5dc6a937cb6 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:42 p.m.