Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Opinion in Coppage v. Kansas | Statement: [Mahlon Pitney, notableWork, Opinion in Coppage v. Kansas]

Target entity: Opinion in Coppage v. Kansas
Context triple: [Mahlon Pitney, notableWork, Opinion in Coppage v. Kansas]

• A. Coppage v. Kansas chosen
  Coppage v. Kansas is a 1915 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law banning “yellow-dog” contracts, reflecting the Lochner-era emphasis on freedom of contract over labor protections.
• B. Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852)
  The Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing certain local regulations affecting interstate commerce when they address inherently local matters.
• C. Scopes v. State
  Scopes v. State was the 1927 Tennessee Supreme Court decision in the famous “Scopes Monkey Trial,” which tested the legality of teaching evolution in public schools and highlighted the clash between modern science and religious fundamentalism.
• D. Cummings v. Missouri
  Cummings v. Missouri was an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down post–Civil War loyalty oath requirements as unconstitutional bills of attainder and ex post facto laws.
• E. Meyer v. Nebraska
  Meyer v. Nebraska is a 1923 U.S. Supreme Court case that recognized substantive due process protections for individual liberties, including parents’ rights to control their children’s education and teachers’ rights to teach foreign languages.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.