Triple

T21327232
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Eugene Landy E525789 entity
Predicate ethicsComplaint P143735 FINISHED
Object dual relationships with client Brian Wilson LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dual relationships with client Brian Wilson | Statement: [Eugene Landy, ethicsComplaint, dual relationships with client Brian Wilson]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethicsComplaint
Context triple: [Eugene Landy, ethicsComplaint, dual relationships with client Brian Wilson]
  • A. complainsAbout
    Indicates that one entity expresses dissatisfaction, criticism, or grievances regarding another entity or situation.
  • B. hasEthicalConflictWith
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are in opposition or tension due to differing ethical principles, values, or standards.
  • C. ethicsAssessment
    Indicates that an entity has been evaluated or judged according to ethical principles, standards, or guidelines.
  • D. ethicalQuality
    Indicates that an entity possesses a moral or ethical characteristic, such as goodness, virtue, or integrity, as evaluated by some ethical standard.
  • E. typeOfEthics
    Indicates a relationship where one concept specifies the particular kind or category of ethics that another concept belongs to or is governed by.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b51b90788190a4dd823d962626da completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e7ab4a796081908148ec9106362d3d completed April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6161feea4819091d13bb003363279 completed April 20, 2026, 12:03 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e6190163448190a2404b396215c686 completed April 20, 2026, 12:16 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:41 p.m.