Triple
T21323516
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fritz Schwalm |
E525685
|
entity |
| Predicate | facedLegalProceeding |
P1692
|
FINISHED |
| Object | post-World War II prosecution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: post-World War II prosecution | Statement: [Fritz Schwalm, facedLegalProceeding, post-World War II prosecution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: facedLegalProceeding Context triple: [Fritz Schwalm, facedLegalProceeding, post-World War II prosecution]
-
A.
hasLegalProceeding
Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
-
B.
hasOngoingLegalSignificance
Indicates that a legal matter, status, or decision continues to have current relevance, effect, or consequences under the law.
-
C.
prosecuted
chosen
Indicates that legal authorities have formally brought criminal charges against an entity and pursued a case against them in a court of law.
-
D.
facedTribunal
Indicates that an entity has been brought before and judged by a formal tribunal or judicial body.
-
E.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b51ad810819098c12392c8e55f6c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e77ed572548190bd71ef690fc7befe |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6161feea4819091d13bb003363279 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:40 p.m.