Triple

T21321476
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject David Embick E525627 entity
Predicate notableWork P4 FINISHED
Object Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology | Statement: [David Embick, notableWork, Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology
Context triple: [David Embick, notableWork, Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology]
  • A. “Lexical Phonology and Morphology”
    “Lexical Phonology and Morphology” is a foundational linguistic work by Paul Kiparsky that develops a theory integrating phonological rules with morphological structure in a stratified lexicon.
  • B. Distributed Morphology
    Distributed Morphology is a theoretical framework in generative linguistics that posits that morphological structure is built in the syntax, integrating word formation with syntactic and phonological processes.
  • C. Aspects of Phonological Theory
    Aspects of Phonological Theory is a seminal work in generative linguistics that helped shape modern phonological theory within the Chomskyan framework.
  • D. “The geometry of phonological features”
    “The geometry of phonological features” is a seminal linguistic work by George N. Clements that proposes a hierarchical, feature-geometric model for representing phonological features in segmental structure.
  • E. “How Abstract is Phonology?”
    “How Abstract is Phonology?” is a seminal linguistic paper by Paul Kiparsky that critically examines the level of abstractness appropriate in phonological representations within generative phonology.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology
Target entity description: "Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology" is a scholarly monograph by linguist David Embick that examines how morphological and phonological processes interact within theoretical models of grammar, contrasting locality-based and more global approaches.
  • A. “Lexical Phonology and Morphology”
    “Lexical Phonology and Morphology” is a foundational linguistic work by Paul Kiparsky that develops a theory integrating phonological rules with morphological structure in a stratified lexicon.
  • B. Distributed Morphology
    Distributed Morphology is a theoretical framework in generative linguistics that posits that morphological structure is built in the syntax, integrating word formation with syntactic and phonological processes.
  • C. Aspects of Phonological Theory
    Aspects of Phonological Theory is a seminal work in generative linguistics that helped shape modern phonological theory within the Chomskyan framework.
  • D. “The geometry of phonological features”
    “The geometry of phonological features” is a seminal linguistic work by George N. Clements that proposes a hierarchical, feature-geometric model for representing phonological features in segmental structure.
  • E. “How Abstract is Phonology?”
    “How Abstract is Phonology?” is a seminal linguistic paper by Paul Kiparsky that critically examines the level of abstractness appropriate in phonological representations within generative phonology.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b51ad810819098c12392c8e55f6c completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e77ed1538c8190954da114e49dfa36 completed April 21, 2026, 1:42 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:39 p.m.