Triple
T21321476
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Embick |
E525627
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology | Statement: [David Embick, notableWork, Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology Context triple: [David Embick, notableWork, Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology]
-
A.
“Lexical Phonology and Morphology”
“Lexical Phonology and Morphology” is a foundational linguistic work by Paul Kiparsky that develops a theory integrating phonological rules with morphological structure in a stratified lexicon.
-
B.
Distributed Morphology
Distributed Morphology is a theoretical framework in generative linguistics that posits that morphological structure is built in the syntax, integrating word formation with syntactic and phonological processes.
-
C.
Aspects of Phonological Theory
Aspects of Phonological Theory is a seminal work in generative linguistics that helped shape modern phonological theory within the Chomskyan framework.
-
D.
“The geometry of phonological features”
“The geometry of phonological features” is a seminal linguistic work by George N. Clements that proposes a hierarchical, feature-geometric model for representing phonological features in segmental structure.
-
E.
“How Abstract is Phonology?”
“How Abstract is Phonology?” is a seminal linguistic paper by Paul Kiparsky that critically examines the level of abstractness appropriate in phonological representations within generative phonology.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology Target entity description: "Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology" is a scholarly monograph by linguist David Embick that examines how morphological and phonological processes interact within theoretical models of grammar, contrasting locality-based and more global approaches.
-
A.
“Lexical Phonology and Morphology”
“Lexical Phonology and Morphology” is a foundational linguistic work by Paul Kiparsky that develops a theory integrating phonological rules with morphological structure in a stratified lexicon.
-
B.
Distributed Morphology
Distributed Morphology is a theoretical framework in generative linguistics that posits that morphological structure is built in the syntax, integrating word formation with syntactic and phonological processes.
-
C.
Aspects of Phonological Theory
Aspects of Phonological Theory is a seminal work in generative linguistics that helped shape modern phonological theory within the Chomskyan framework.
-
D.
“The geometry of phonological features”
“The geometry of phonological features” is a seminal linguistic work by George N. Clements that proposes a hierarchical, feature-geometric model for representing phonological features in segmental structure.
-
E.
“How Abstract is Phonology?”
“How Abstract is Phonology?” is a seminal linguistic paper by Paul Kiparsky that critically examines the level of abstractness appropriate in phonological representations within generative phonology.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b51ad810819098c12392c8e55f6c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e77ed1538c8190954da114e49dfa36 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:39 p.m.