Triple
T21321156
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oregon County, Missouri |
E525618
|
entity |
| Predicate | largestCity |
P235
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Thayer, Missouri |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Thayer, Missouri | Statement: [Oregon County, Missouri, largestCity, Thayer, Missouri]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Thayer, Missouri Context triple: [Oregon County, Missouri, largestCity, Thayer, Missouri]
-
A.
Thayer, Missouri
chosen
Thayer, Missouri is a small city in southern Missouri near the Arkansas border that serves as a regional crossroads and gateway to the Ozarks.
-
B.
Thompson, Missouri
Thompson, Missouri is a small unincorporated rural community located in Audrain County in the U.S. state of Missouri.
-
C.
Estill, Missouri
Estill, Missouri is a small unincorporated community located in Howard County in the central part of the state.
-
D.
Novinger, Missouri
Novinger, Missouri is a small rural community in northern Missouri historically known for its coal mining heritage.
-
E.
Weatherby, Missouri
Weatherby, Missouri is a small rural village located in DeKalb County in the northwestern part of the U.S. state of Missouri.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b51ad810819098c12392c8e55f6c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e77ed1538c8190954da114e49dfa36 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 1:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:39 p.m.