Triple
T21311348
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | James H. Morris |
E525341
|
entity |
| Predicate | developedAlgorithm |
P73
|
FINISHED |
| Object | linear-time string-searching algorithm |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: linear-time string-searching algorithm | Statement: [James H. Morris, developedAlgorithm, linear-time string-searching algorithm]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developedAlgorithm Context triple: [James H. Morris, developedAlgorithm, linear-time string-searching algorithm]
-
A.
developedMethodUsedIn
Indicates that a method created or developed by one entity is subsequently employed or applied in another entity, such as a study, project, or process.
-
B.
developedMethodology
Indicates that one entity created, designed, or established a specific methodology used by another entity or in a particular context.
-
C.
developedAs
Indicates that one entity was created, designed, or evolved specifically to function as or replace another entity.
-
D.
developed
chosen
Indicates that one entity created, designed, or brought another entity into a more advanced or complete state through effort or work.
-
E.
developedThrough
Indicates that something came into existence, was created, or was brought to its current form by means of a specified process, method, or developmental pathway.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b518b8948190ad69cf9a8784d397 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e75dc926c881909d70a317070ef295 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e61612ab748190a72b8703b938abcb |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:17 p.m.