Triple
T21309418
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pokomo people |
E525288
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesLanguage |
P238
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pokomo language |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pokomo language | Statement: [Pokomo people, usesLanguage, Pokomo language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pokomo language Context triple: [Pokomo people, usesLanguage, Pokomo language]
-
A.
Pokomo language
chosen
The Pokomo language is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Pokomo people along Kenya’s Tana River.
-
B.
Patamona language
The Patamona language is an indigenous Cariban language spoken by the Patamona people of the Guiana Highlands in Guyana and northern Brazil.
-
C.
Poqomam language
The Poqomam language is a Mayan language spoken primarily in Guatemala by the Poqomam people, recognized as part of the country’s indigenous linguistic heritage.
-
D.
Podoko language
The Podoko language is a Chadic language spoken by the Podoko people in northern Cameroon, closely related to other Mandara languages of the region.
-
E.
Pokot language
The Pokot language is a Southern Nilotic language spoken by the Pokot people of Kenya and Uganda.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b518b8948190ad69cf9a8784d397 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e75aa916548190a11f8bb4255e3fed |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:06 p.m.