Triple

T21306474
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article 132 of the Constitution of India E525210 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Article 134A of the Constitution of India — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Article 134A of the Constitution of India | Statement: [Article 132 of the Constitution of India, relatedTo, Article 134A of the Constitution of India]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Article 134A of the Constitution of India
Context triple: [Article 132 of the Constitution of India, relatedTo, Article 134A of the Constitution of India]
  • A. Article 134 of the Constitution of India
    Article 134 of the Constitution of India is a provision that grants the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction in certain criminal cases decided by High Courts.
  • B. Article 131A of the Constitution of India
    Article 131A of the Constitution of India was a (now repealed) provision that vested the Supreme Court with exclusive jurisdiction to determine the constitutional validity of Central laws.
  • C. Article 144A of the Constitution of India
    Article 144A of the Constitution of India was a now-repealed provision that required a minimum bench of seven Supreme Court judges and a special majority to declare any law unconstitutional.
  • D. Article 124A of the Constitution of India
    Article 124A of the Constitution of India is the provision that establishes the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) for the appointment of judges to the higher judiciary.
  • E. Article 133 of the Constitution of India
    Article 133 of the Constitution of India lays down the conditions under which an appeal lies to the Supreme Court from judgments, decrees or final orders in civil proceedings of High Courts.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Article 134A of the Constitution of India
Target entity description: Article 134A of the Constitution of India is a procedural provision that empowers High Courts to certify cases as fit for appeal to the Supreme Court in certain criminal matters.
  • A. Article 134 of the Constitution of India
    Article 134 of the Constitution of India is a provision that grants the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction in certain criminal cases decided by High Courts.
  • B. Article 131A of the Constitution of India
    Article 131A of the Constitution of India was a (now repealed) provision that vested the Supreme Court with exclusive jurisdiction to determine the constitutional validity of Central laws.
  • C. Article 144A of the Constitution of India
    Article 144A of the Constitution of India was a now-repealed provision that required a minimum bench of seven Supreme Court judges and a special majority to declare any law unconstitutional.
  • D. Article 124A of the Constitution of India
    Article 124A of the Constitution of India is the provision that establishes the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) for the appointment of judges to the higher judiciary.
  • E. Article 133 of the Constitution of India
    Article 133 of the Constitution of India lays down the conditions under which an appeal lies to the Supreme Court from judgments, decrees or final orders in civil proceedings of High Courts.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b518b8948190ad69cf9a8784d397 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e75aa52a508190bb5dc806b6483574 completed April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:05 p.m.