Triple

T2130603
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CPLD E46529 entity
Predicate hasAdvantageOverFPGA P635 FINISHED
Object simpler architecture LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: simpler architecture | Statement: [CPLD, hasAdvantageOverFPGA, simpler architecture]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAdvantageOverFPGA
Context triple: [CPLD, hasAdvantageOverFPGA, simpler architecture]
  • A. hasAdvantage chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses a benefit, edge, or favorable position over another in a given context.
  • B. hasALU
    Indicates that an entity includes or is equipped with an Arithmetic Logic Unit (ALU) as a component or functional part.
  • C. programmedVia
    Indicates that one entity is created, configured, or made to operate through the use of another entity as its programming method, tool, or medium.
  • D. hasHardwareCompatibilityWith
    Indicates that two hardware components or systems can operate together correctly and reliably without conflicts or incompatibilities.
  • E. hasRapids
    Indicates that a body of water contains sections of fast-flowing, turbulent water known as rapids.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88a1626548190ae59a5028c3baa8e completed March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abbb79f21881909ad8d1a09c1f29fd completed March 7, 2026, 5:45 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abb7bd86cc8190938ef06c1ed6d969 completed March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.