Triple
T21300603
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mula-Mutha River |
E525050
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBankUsedFor |
P143648
|
FINISHED |
| Object | recreational activities in Pune |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: recreational activities in Pune | Statement: [Mula-Mutha River, hasBankUsedFor, recreational activities in Pune]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBankUsedFor Context triple: [Mula-Mutha River, hasBankUsedFor, recreational activities in Pune]
-
A.
hasBankOn
Indicates that one entity is located on or alongside the bank (edge) of another entity, typically a river, lake, or similar body.
-
B.
hasBank
Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is served by a particular bank (such as a financial institution or river bank).
-
C.
hasBanking
Indicates that one entity provides or is associated with banking services or facilities for another entity.
-
D.
hasBankType
Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified by a particular type or category of bank.
-
E.
usesBanking
Indicates that one entity makes use of the banking services, facilities, or systems provided by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b517e6748190850d6f6ddf323d69 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e7385c078881908a451be1a19a64c5 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e61612ab748190a72b8703b938abcb |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:03 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e6190163448190a2404b396215c686 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:05 p.m.