Triple
T2128547
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ernesto Arturo Miranda |
E46480
|
entity |
| Predicate | supremeCourtDecisionEffect |
P12285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | original conviction overturned |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: original conviction overturned | Statement: [Ernesto Arturo Miranda, supremeCourtDecisionEffect, original conviction overturned]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supremeCourtDecisionEffect Context triple: [Ernesto Arturo Miranda, supremeCourtDecisionEffect, original conviction overturned]
-
A.
SupremeCourtEffect
chosen
Indicates that an action, decision, or condition has an effect that is determined by, derived from, or constrained by the rulings or authority of a supreme court.
-
B.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
C.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
D.
courtInfluence
Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
-
E.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a1626548190ae59a5028c3baa8e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbb7659f48190871cb27faf47e18a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7bd86cc8190938ef06c1ed6d969 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.