Triple
T21281259
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John Tavares |
E524528
|
entity |
| Predicate | holdsRecordInNLL |
P2722
|
FINISHED |
| Object | all-time points leader |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: all-time points leader | Statement: [John Tavares, holdsRecordInNLL, all-time points leader]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holdsRecordInNLL Context triple: [John Tavares, holdsRecordInNLL, all-time points leader]
-
A.
holdsTo
Indicates that one entity maintains, adheres, or remains committed to another entity, such as a belief, standard, agreement, or condition.
-
B.
holdsIn
Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
-
C.
recordHeld
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses or maintains a particular record associated with another entity or context.
-
D.
recordHeldIn
Indicates that a record is stored, maintained, or kept within a particular location, system, or repository.
-
E.
recordHeldFor
Indicates that one entity is being kept, stored, or maintained on behalf of or in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b5171f6c8190a5d57201ede73811 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e736d186988190a5b16fcb669ece9f |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5f6161dac8190b06009cd180e3ff7 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:02 p.m.