Triple
T21275388
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ostróda County |
E524373
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRuralGmina |
P46876
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Łukta |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Łukta | Statement: [Ostróda County, hasRuralGmina, Gmina Łukta]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Łukta Context triple: [Ostróda County, hasRuralGmina, Gmina Łukta]
-
A.
Gmina Łukta
chosen
Gmina Łukta is a rural administrative district in northern Poland’s Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, known for its forests, lakes, and small villages.
-
B.
Gmina Łuków
Gmina Łuków is a rural administrative district in eastern Poland surrounding the town of Łuków in the Lublin Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Łącko
Gmina Łącko is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, known for its picturesque mountainous landscapes and traditional highland culture.
-
D.
gmina Łukowica
Gmina Łukowica is a rural municipality in southern Poland known for its hilly landscapes and traditional villages within the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gmina Łużna
Gmina Łużna is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b516293c819089458ea2ec85f85e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e7365627a081908caea09097cca354 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:02 p.m.