Triple

T21274306
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Joy Smythe E524348 entity
Predicate relativeMoralAlignment P117295 FINISHED
Object antagonistic child character LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: antagonistic child character | Statement: [Joy Smythe, relativeMoralAlignment, antagonistic child character]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relativeMoralAlignment
Context triple: [Joy Smythe, relativeMoralAlignment, antagonistic child character]
  • A. speciesAlignment
    Indicates how closely related or compatible two species are in terms of traits, behavior, or evolutionary relationship.
  • B. characterAlignment
    Indicates the moral or ethical stance a character holds, typically along axes such as good–evil and lawful–chaotic.
  • C. moralAttitude
    Indicates a subject’s evaluative stance or judgment about the moral rightness or wrongness of another entity, action, or situation.
  • D. moralTendency
    Indicates a general inclination or propensity of an entity to act in ways judged as morally right or wrong.
  • E. isMoralFoilFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a contrasting counterpart whose differing moral qualities highlight or emphasize the moral traits of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b516293c819089458ea2ec85f85e completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e73655717c819092f71ed1920f52b5 completed April 21, 2026, 8:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5f6161dac8190b06009cd180e3ff7 completed April 20, 2026, 9:47 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:01 p.m.