Triple
T21274127
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | José Nasazzi |
E524343
|
entity |
| Predicate | isInTheHallOfFameOf |
P67669
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Uruguayan football |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Uruguayan football | Statement: [José Nasazzi, isInTheHallOfFameOf, Uruguayan football]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isInTheHallOfFameOf Context triple: [José Nasazzi, isInTheHallOfFameOf, Uruguayan football]
-
A.
hasHallOfFameParent
Indicates that an entity has a parent who is a member of a Hall of Fame.
-
B.
hasSportsHallOfFame
Indicates that an entity possesses or hosts a designated Sports Hall of Fame associated with it.
-
C.
namedAfterHallOfFame
Indicates that one entity is named in honor of, or after, a Hall of Fame or a Hall of Fame inductee.
-
D.
hallOfFameConnection
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity is connected to a hall of fame, such as by being inducted, nominated, or otherwise formally associated with it.
-
E.
hallOfFameAssociation
Indicates that an entity is formally associated with a hall of fame, such as through induction, nomination, or recognition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b516293c819089458ea2ec85f85e |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e73655717c819092f71ed1920f52b5 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5f6161dac8190b06009cd180e3ff7 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:01 p.m.