Triple

T21272340
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lincoln National Forest E524292 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Guadalupe Ranger District NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Guadalupe Ranger District | Statement: [Lincoln National Forest, contains, Guadalupe Ranger District]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Guadalupe Ranger District
Context triple: [Lincoln National Forest, contains, Guadalupe Ranger District]
  • A. Socorro Ranger District
    The Socorro Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Cibola National Forest in central New Mexico that manages public lands and natural resources, including the San Mateo Mountains.
  • B. Mesa Ranger District
    Mesa Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Tonto National Forest in central Arizona, responsible for managing recreation, wildlife, and natural resources in the Mesa-area portion of the forest.
  • C. Tusayan Ranger District
    Tusayan Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Kaibab National Forest in northern Arizona that manages forest resources, recreation, and conservation near the Grand Canyon.
  • D. Palomar Ranger District
    Palomar Ranger District is a management unit of the Cleveland National Forest in Southern California, overseeing recreation, conservation, and land use in the Palomar Mountain area.
  • E. Sandia Ranger District
    Sandia Ranger District is a U.S. Forest Service administrative unit encompassing the Sandia Mountains area near Albuquerque, New Mexico, known for its popular hiking, skiing, and scenic recreation opportunities.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Guadalupe Ranger District
Target entity description: Guadalupe Ranger District is a management unit of the Lincoln National Forest in southeastern New Mexico, known for its rugged Guadalupe Mountains landscapes and diverse desert and forest ecosystems.
  • A. Socorro Ranger District
    The Socorro Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Cibola National Forest in central New Mexico that manages public lands and natural resources, including the San Mateo Mountains.
  • B. Mesa Ranger District
    Mesa Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Tonto National Forest in central Arizona, responsible for managing recreation, wildlife, and natural resources in the Mesa-area portion of the forest.
  • C. Tusayan Ranger District
    Tusayan Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Kaibab National Forest in northern Arizona that manages forest resources, recreation, and conservation near the Grand Canyon.
  • D. Palomar Ranger District
    Palomar Ranger District is a management unit of the Cleveland National Forest in Southern California, overseeing recreation, conservation, and land use in the Palomar Mountain area.
  • E. Sandia Ranger District
    Sandia Ranger District is a U.S. Forest Service administrative unit encompassing the Sandia Mountains area near Albuquerque, New Mexico, known for its popular hiking, skiing, and scenic recreation opportunities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b516293c819089458ea2ec85f85e completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e73654ba148190a2eb0a06363cbd0b completed April 21, 2026, 8:33 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:01 p.m.