Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: advisory opinion of International Court of Justice | Statement: [Chagos Archipelago, subjectOf, advisory opinion of International Court of Justice]

Target entity: advisory opinion of International Court of Justice
Context triple: [Chagos Archipelago, subjectOf, advisory opinion of International Court of Justice]

• A. International Court of Justice advisory opinions chosen
  International Court of Justice advisory opinions are non-binding legal interpretations issued by the UN’s principal judicial organ that clarify questions of international law for UN bodies and specialized agencies.
• B. International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975)
  The International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975) was a landmark legal ruling that concluded Western Sahara was not terra nullius at the time of Spanish colonization and affirmed the Sahrawi people's right to self-determination.
• C. International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo’s declaration of independence
  The International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo’s declaration of independence is a 2010 legal judgment in which the UN’s principal judicial organ concluded that Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence from Serbia did not violate international law.
• D. ICJ Wall Advisory Opinion
  The ICJ Wall Advisory Opinion is a 2004 advisory judgment by the International Court of Justice that found Israel’s construction of a separation barrier in the occupied Palestinian territory contrary to international law and clarified states’ obligations regarding its consequences.
• E. International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (1996)
  The International Court of Justice’s 1996 advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons is a landmark legal assessment that examined whether nuclear weapons could ever be lawful under international law and clarified states’ obligations to pursue nuclear disarmament in good faith.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.