Triple

T21243309
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Redfield ratio E523536 entity
Predicate hasCarbonToNitrogenRatio P143345 FINISHED
Object C:N = 106:16 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: C:N = 106:16 | Statement: [Redfield ratio, hasCarbonToNitrogenRatio, C:N = 106:16]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCarbonToNitrogenRatio
Context triple: [Redfield ratio, hasCarbonToNitrogenRatio, C:N = 106:16]
  • A. hasTypicalCarbonContentRange
    Indicates the usual lower and upper bounds of carbon content typically found in or associated with an entity.
  • B. carbonateContent
    Indicates the proportion or amount of carbonate present in a given material or sample.
  • C. hasNitrogenousBase
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a specific nitrogenous base as a component or characteristic.
  • D. isotopicRatioWithNitrogen15Notation
    Indicates the relationship in which an entity’s nitrogen-15 isotopic ratio is expressed using a specific notation or reporting format.
  • E. fractionOfAtmosphericNitrogen
    Indicates the proportion of atmospheric nitrogen that is attributed to, contained in, or associated with a given entity or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b513b89c81908b27147e91368db2 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e7352507448190ba1f14cef16d69be completed April 21, 2026, 8:28 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5f61239708190ab7b3c83ae848a0d completed April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5f9943ed881909ef49045c5bcf6df completed April 20, 2026, 10:01 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:47 p.m.