Triple

T21224739
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Megaco E523060 entity
Predicate abbreviation P43 FINISHED
Object MEGACO NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: MEGACO | Statement: [Megaco, abbreviation, MEGACO]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: MEGACO
Context triple: [Megaco, abbreviation, MEGACO]
  • A. H.248
    H.248 is an ITU-T protocol, also known as Megaco, used for controlling media gateways in next-generation and IP multimedia networks.
  • B. MGCP
    MGCP (Media Gateway Control Protocol) is a signaling and call control protocol used in VoIP systems to manage media gateways under the control of call agents or media gateway controllers.
  • C. H.323
    H.323 is an ITU-T standard that defines protocols for voice, video, and data communication over packet-based networks such as IP.
  • D. H.245
    H.245 is an ITU-T control protocol used in multimedia communication systems to negotiate channel usage and capabilities between endpoints.
  • E. Megaco chosen
    Megaco is a signaling protocol used in telecommunications networks to control media gateways that connect different types of communication systems, such as VoIP and traditional telephone networks.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b512ad94819087942b2ed925185f completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e734aa82c4819086cef6364619b4e9 completed April 21, 2026, 8:26 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:44 p.m.