Triple
T21213971
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California portion of Truckee River Basin |
E522788
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInterstateWaterAgreement |
P63014
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Truckee River Operating Agreement |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Truckee River Operating Agreement | Statement: [California portion of Truckee River Basin, hasInterstateWaterAgreement, Truckee River Operating Agreement]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Truckee River Operating Agreement Context triple: [California portion of Truckee River Basin, hasInterstateWaterAgreement, Truckee River Operating Agreement]
-
A.
Truckee River Operating Agreement
chosen
The Truckee River Operating Agreement is a comprehensive water management pact that allocates and coordinates the use of Truckee River water among California, Nevada, tribal nations, and federal interests to balance municipal, agricultural, environmental, and recreational needs.
-
B.
Truckee-Carson-Pyramid Lake Water Rights Settlement Act of 1990
The Truckee-Carson-Pyramid Lake Water Rights Settlement Act of 1990 is a U.S. federal law that resolves long-standing water allocation disputes in the Truckee, Carson, and Pyramid Lake basins, particularly balancing tribal, agricultural, and environmental water rights in Nevada and California.
-
C.
Truckee Meadows Water Authority
Truckee Meadows Water Authority is a public water utility that manages and delivers drinking water to the Truckee Meadows region around Reno, Nevada.
-
D.
Truckee-Carson Irrigation District
The Truckee-Carson Irrigation District is a water management agency in western Nevada that operates and maintains irrigation and drainage systems, primarily serving agricultural lands in the Truckee and Carson River basins.
-
E.
Yellowstone River Compact
The Yellowstone River Compact is an interstate agreement among U.S. states that allocates and manages the waters of the Yellowstone River and its tributaries within the Missouri River Basin.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInterstateWaterAgreement Context triple: [California portion of Truckee River Basin, hasInterstateWaterAgreement, Truckee River Operating Agreement]
-
A.
hasWatershedAgreement
chosen
Indicates that there is a formal agreement or arrangement governing the shared use, management, or protection of a watershed between the related entities.
-
B.
isInterstateWaterBodyPortion
Indicates that a water body segment is part of a water system that crosses or forms boundaries between states or equivalent jurisdictions.
-
C.
isSharedWatercourseBetween
Indicates that a watercourse (such as a river, stream, or canal) is jointly used, bordered, or managed by two or more distinct entities (e.g., regions, countries, or properties).
-
D.
hasInterstate
Indicates that there exists an interstate connection or highway link between the related entities.
-
E.
transboundaryWaterManagement
Indicates the cooperative planning, regulation, and use of shared water resources that cross political or administrative boundaries between different jurisdictions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b511ed84819099b449b4a111085c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e7347088488190aa764b3f4bbac44d |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5f6094e3c81909ee9699e00d371f7 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:39 p.m.