Triple
T21212419
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joseph Shine v. Union of India |
E522751
|
entity |
| Predicate | overruledPrecedent |
P2251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | V. Revathi v. Union of India |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: V. Revathi v. Union of India | Statement: [Joseph Shine v. Union of India, overruledPrecedent, V. Revathi v. Union of India]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: V. Revathi v. Union of India Context triple: [Joseph Shine v. Union of India, overruledPrecedent, V. Revathi v. Union of India]
-
A.
Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India
Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India was a Supreme Court of India decision that had upheld the constitutionality of the adultery offence under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code before it was later invalidated.
-
B.
Waman Rao v. Union of India
Waman Rao v. Union of India is a landmark 1981 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed and clarified the basic structure doctrine by upholding its applicability to constitutional amendments made after the Kesavananda Bharati decision.
-
C.
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed judicial review as part of the Constitution’s basic structure and held that decisions of tribunals are subject to scrutiny by High Courts under Articles 226 and 227.
-
D.
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India is a landmark 2014 Supreme Court of India judgment that legally recognized transgender people as a third gender and affirmed their fundamental rights and entitlement to affirmative action.
-
E.
S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India
S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India is a Supreme Court of India judgment that examined the constitutional status, powers, and independence of the Election Commission and its officers in the context of electoral administration.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: V. Revathi v. Union of India Target entity description: V. Revathi v. Union of India is a Supreme Court of India judgment that had upheld the constitutional validity of the adultery provision in the Indian Penal Code prior to its later invalidation in Joseph Shine v. Union of India.
-
A.
Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India
chosen
Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India was a Supreme Court of India decision that had upheld the constitutionality of the adultery offence under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code before it was later invalidated.
-
B.
Waman Rao v. Union of India
Waman Rao v. Union of India is a landmark 1981 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed and clarified the basic structure doctrine by upholding its applicability to constitutional amendments made after the Kesavananda Bharati decision.
-
C.
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed judicial review as part of the Constitution’s basic structure and held that decisions of tribunals are subject to scrutiny by High Courts under Articles 226 and 227.
-
D.
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India is a landmark 2014 Supreme Court of India judgment that legally recognized transgender people as a third gender and affirmed their fundamental rights and entitlement to affirmative action.
-
E.
S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India
S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India is a Supreme Court of India judgment that examined the constitutional status, powers, and independence of the Election Commission and its officers in the context of electoral administration.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b511ed84819099b449b4a111085c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e7346f762c8190a9f57d9e00d94d28 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:38 p.m.