Triple
T21212304
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India |
E522749
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Justice K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India | Statement: [Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, relatedCase, Justice K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India Context triple: [Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, relatedCase, Justice K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India]
-
A.
Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India
chosen
Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India is a landmark 2017 Supreme Court of India judgment that unanimously affirmed the fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution.
-
B.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is a landmark 1973 Supreme Court of India judgment that established the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
-
C.
T. M. A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
T. M. A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka is a landmark 2002 Supreme Court of India judgment that redefined the constitutional rights of private and minority educational institutions regarding establishment, administration, and state regulation.
-
D.
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed judicial review as part of the Constitution’s basic structure and held that decisions of tribunals are subject to scrutiny by High Courts under Articles 226 and 227.
-
E.
S. R. Bommai v. Union of India
S. R. Bommai v. Union of India is a landmark 1994 Supreme Court of India judgment that curtailed the arbitrary use of President’s Rule and strengthened federalism by applying the basic structure doctrine to center-state relations.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b511ed84819099b449b4a111085c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e7346f762c8190a9f57d9e00d94d28 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:38 p.m.