Triple
T21204215
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Politics of Estonia |
E522534
|
entity |
| Predicate | restoredIndependence |
P8689
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1991 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1991 | Statement: [Politics of Estonia, restoredIndependence, 1991]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: restoredIndependence Context triple: [Politics of Estonia, restoredIndependence, 1991]
-
A.
independenceRestored
chosen
Indicates that a previously dependent or controlled entity has regained its autonomy or self-governance.
-
B.
gainedIndependenceThrough
Indicates that an entity achieved its independence by means of, or as a result of, a specified process, event, agreement, or struggle.
-
C.
gainedIndependenceAs
Indicates that an entity achieved political or administrative independence in the specific form, status, or identity denoted by another entity.
-
D.
endOfIndependence
Indicates the point or event at which an entity’s prior state of independence comes to an end, typically due to loss of autonomy or incorporation into another entity.
-
E.
independenceGranted
Indicates that one entity has formally conferred political or operational autonomy to another entity, ending or reducing prior control or dependency.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b5112d8881909510b2dcdc93106d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e7343367308190b1b772d3c8e25dcb |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5f6094e3c81909ee9699e00d371f7 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:19 p.m.