Triple
T21199655
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TVML |
E522418
|
entity |
| Predicate | logicImplementedIn |
P22535
|
FINISHED |
| Object | JavaScript running on tvOS |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: JavaScript running on tvOS | Statement: [TVML, logicImplementedIn, JavaScript running on tvOS]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: logicImplementedIn Context triple: [TVML, logicImplementedIn, JavaScript running on tvOS]
-
A.
implementedFor
Indicates that one entity has been created, developed, or configured to operate on behalf of, or to fulfill the needs or requirements of, another entity.
-
B.
implementedUnder
Indicates that an action, policy, or process is carried out within the scope, authority, or framework defined by a particular higher-level plan, rule, or governing entity.
-
C.
implementedOn
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a feature, standard, or specification) is realized, executed, or put into effect within or on a particular platform, system, or environment.
-
D.
implementedInLanguage
Indicates that a piece of software or code is written using a particular programming language.
-
E.
areImplementedBy
Indicates that one entity serves as the concrete realization or execution of the specification, design, or interface defined by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b51061388190aa03f19700d3ef04 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e7342fe3a08190b7ed2cadf60091a8 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5f6094e3c81909ee9699e00d371f7 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:17 p.m.