Triple

T21196866
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Government of Utah E522348 entity
Predicate hasPart P35 FINISHED
Object Judicial branch of Utah — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Judicial branch of Utah | Statement: [Government of Utah, hasPart, Judicial branch of Utah]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Judicial branch of Utah
Context triple: [Government of Utah, hasPart, Judicial branch of Utah]
  • A. Judicial branch of Vermont
    The Judicial branch of Vermont is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting Vermont law, administering justice, and resolving legal disputes through its various levels of courts.
  • B. Judicial branch of Montana
    The Judicial branch of Montana is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting Montana’s laws and constitution, resolving legal disputes, and ensuring justice is administered fairly across the state.
  • C. Judicial branch of Ohio
    The Judicial branch of Ohio is the state government branch responsible for interpreting and applying Ohio’s laws and constitution through a system of courts headed by the Supreme Court of Ohio.
  • D. Judicial Branch of California
    The Judicial Branch of California is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting and applying California law through the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, and superior courts.
  • E. Judicial Branch of Colorado
    The Judicial Branch of Colorado is the state government branch responsible for interpreting and applying Colorado law through its system of courts, including the Colorado Supreme Court and lower state courts.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Judicial branch of Utah
Target entity description: The Judicial branch of Utah is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting Utah law, administering justice, and resolving legal disputes through its various levels of courts.
  • A. Judicial branch of Vermont
    The Judicial branch of Vermont is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting Vermont law, administering justice, and resolving legal disputes through its various levels of courts.
  • B. Judicial branch of Montana
    The Judicial branch of Montana is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting Montana’s laws and constitution, resolving legal disputes, and ensuring justice is administered fairly across the state.
  • C. Judicial branch of Ohio
    The Judicial branch of Ohio is the state government branch responsible for interpreting and applying Ohio’s laws and constitution through a system of courts headed by the Supreme Court of Ohio.
  • D. Judicial Branch of California
    The Judicial Branch of California is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting and applying California law through the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, and superior courts.
  • E. Judicial Branch of Colorado
    The Judicial Branch of Colorado is the state government branch responsible for interpreting and applying Colorado law through its system of courts, including the Colorado Supreme Court and lower state courts.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b51061388190aa03f19700d3ef04 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e7333c9bac8190a203802a8b8e4143 completed April 21, 2026, 8:20 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:08 p.m.