Triple
T21192764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Polar codes for control channels |
E522251
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | capacity-achieving code |
C34798
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: capacity-achieving code Context triple: [Polar codes for control channels, instanceOf, capacity-achieving code]
-
A.
bound in coding theory
In coding theory, a bound is a theoretical limit that constrains parameters such as code length, dimension, and minimum distance, defining what combinations are possible or optimal for error-correcting codes.
-
B.
linear block code
A linear block code is an error-correcting code that encodes fixed-length blocks of data into longer blocks using linear algebra over a finite field, enabling detection and correction of transmission errors.
-
C.
error-correcting code
chosen
An error-correcting code is a method of encoding data with redundant information so that errors introduced during transmission or storage can be detected and corrected.
-
D.
coding theory pioneer
A coding theory pioneer is an individual who develops foundational concepts, algorithms, or frameworks that advance the mathematical design and analysis of error-detecting and error-correcting codes for reliable communication and data storage.
-
E.
multi-carrier modulation technique
A multi-carrier modulation technique is a method of transmitting data by dividing it across multiple closely spaced subcarriers, each modulated with a portion of the data stream to improve spectral efficiency and robustness against channel impairments.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b51061388190aa03f19700d3ef04 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:07 p.m.