Triple
T21190296
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aguilar v. Texas |
E522192
|
entity |
| Predicate | influenceOnLaterCase |
P12604
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Aguilar two-pronged test was refined and replaced by the totality-of-the-circumstances test in Illinois v. Gates. |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Aguilar two-pronged test was refined and replaced by the totality-of-the-circumstances test in Illinois v. Gates. | Statement: [Aguilar v. Texas, influenceOnLaterCase, The Aguilar two-pronged test was refined and replaced by the totality-of-the-circumstances test in Illinois v. Gates.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: influenceOnLaterCase Context triple: [Aguilar v. Texas, influenceOnLaterCase, The Aguilar two-pronged test was refined and replaced by the totality-of-the-circumstances test in Illinois v. Gates.]
-
A.
influencedByCourtCase
Indicates that an entity’s state, decision, or development is shaped or altered as a result of a specific court case or its outcome.
-
B.
influencedCourtDecision
chosen
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
C.
courtInfluence
Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
-
D.
courtInfluenceUnder
Indicates that one court operates under the legal authority, jurisdiction, or influence of another, higher court.
-
E.
hasSubsequentInfluence
Indicates that one entity has an influence or effect that occurs after, and is causally or temporally downstream from, another entity or event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b51061388190aa03f19700d3ef04 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e733372b488190920174955b4b9172 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5f6027c248190a170a36612bd337e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:07 p.m.