Triple
T21190191
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Illinois v. Gates |
E522190
|
entity |
| Predicate | replacedStandard |
P28535
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Aguilar–Spinelli two-pronged test |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Aguilar–Spinelli two-pronged test | Statement: [Illinois v. Gates, replacedStandard, Aguilar–Spinelli two-pronged test]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Aguilar–Spinelli two-pronged test Context triple: [Illinois v. Gates, replacedStandard, Aguilar–Spinelli two-pronged test]
-
A.
Aguilar–Spinelli test
chosen
The Aguilar–Spinelli test is a former U.S. legal standard that strictly governed when hearsay information from informants could establish probable cause for search warrants, requiring proof of both the informant’s basis of knowledge and veracity.
-
B.
Lemon test
The Lemon test is a three-pronged legal standard used by U.S. courts to determine whether a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
-
C.
Sparrow criterion
The Sparrow criterion is an optical resolution limit that defines the point at which two closely spaced point sources become indistinguishable because the dip between their combined intensity profiles just disappears.
-
D.
Aguilar v. Felton
Aguilar v. Felton was a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held it unconstitutional for public school teachers to provide remedial education on the premises of religious schools under a federal aid program, based on Establishment Clause concerns.
-
E.
The rigid two-pronged Aguilar–Spinelli test is abandoned in favor of a more flexible totality of the circumstances approach.
This is the central holding of Illinois v. Gates, a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped the standard for evaluating probable cause based on informants’ tips under the Fourth Amendment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b51061388190aa03f19700d3ef04 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e733372b488190920174955b4b9172 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:07 p.m.