Triple

T21190025
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minnesota v. Dickerson E522186 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Arizona v. Hicks — NE NERFINISHED

Disambiguation candidates (2 decisions)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Arizona v. Hicks
Context triple: [Minnesota v. Dickerson, relatedCase, Arizona v. Hicks]
  • A. Arizona v. Evans
    Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
  • B. Arizona v. Fulminante
    Arizona v. Fulminante is a landmark 1991 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held a coerced confession can be treated as trial error subject to harmless-error analysis rather than as automatically requiring reversal of a conviction.
  • C. Arizona v. Johnson
    Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
  • D. Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
  • E. Gonzales v. Arizona
    Gonzales v. Arizona is a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of Arizona’s voter identification and proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and voting.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Arizona v. Hicks
Target entity description: Arizona v. Hicks is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited police authority to move objects and inspect them without probable cause during a lawful search, helping define the scope of the Fourth Amendment’s protections.
  • A. Arizona v. Evans
    Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
  • B. Arizona v. Fulminante
    Arizona v. Fulminante is a landmark 1991 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held a coerced confession can be treated as trial error subject to harmless-error analysis rather than as automatically requiring reversal of a conviction.
  • C. Arizona v. Johnson
    Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
  • D. Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
  • E. Gonzales v. Arizona
    Gonzales v. Arizona is a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of Arizona’s voter identification and proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and voting.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69e0b51061388190aa03f19700d3ef04 elicitation completed
NER batch_69e733372b488190920174955b4b9172 ner completed
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:07 p.m.