Triple
T21182625
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gmina Łagów |
E521989
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOfficialName |
P66
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Łagów |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Łagów | Statement: [Gmina Łagów, hasOfficialName, Gmina Łagów]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Łagów Context triple: [Gmina Łagów, hasOfficialName, Gmina Łagów]
-
A.
Gmina Łagów
chosen
Gmina Łagów is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, located in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
B.
Gmina Łask
Gmina Łask is an urban-rural administrative district in central Poland, centered on the town of Łask in the Łódź Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Łącko
Gmina Łącko is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, known for its picturesque mountainous landscapes and traditional highland culture.
-
D.
Gmina Łabowa
Gmina Łabowa is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship and known for its mountainous landscapes within the Beskid Sądecki range.
-
E.
Gmina Łowicz
Gmina Łowicz is a rural administrative district in central Poland, located in Łowicz County within the Łódź Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50ef1d48190b063aa342667df22 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e7301eb3248190b9f6fc1586651fec |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:04 p.m.