Triple

T21178056
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject IC 1848 E521866 entity
Predicate photographicAppearance P143171 FINISHED
Object loose grouping of stars LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: loose grouping of stars | Statement: [IC 1848, photographicAppearance, loose grouping of stars]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: photographicAppearance
Context triple: [IC 1848, photographicAppearance, loose grouping of stars]
  • A. mediaAppearanceType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of media appearance associated with an entity (e.g., interview, feature, cameo, or performance).
  • B. isPhotographicSubject
    Indicates that an entity serves as the subject or main focus captured in a photograph taken by another entity.
  • C. hasPhotogenicFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses a visual characteristic or attribute that is especially attractive or appealing when photographed.
  • D. hasPhotoAppeal
    Indicates that something possesses qualities that make it visually attractive or appealing in photographs.
  • E. publicAppearance
    Indicates that an entity participates in or is present at an event or situation that is open or visible to the general public.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b50ef1d48190b063aa342667df22 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e7301a8198819092daa1c847889a88 completed April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5f6027c248190a170a36612bd337e completed April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e5f993240c8190847c0b08e65726c8 completed April 20, 2026, 10:01 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3 p.m.