Triple
T21169445
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Collegiate Inventors Competition |
E521654
|
entity |
| Predicate | judgingPanel |
P114040
|
FINISHED |
| Object | patent examiners |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: patent examiners | Statement: [Collegiate Inventors Competition, judgingPanel, patent examiners]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judgingPanel Context triple: [Collegiate Inventors Competition, judgingPanel, patent examiners]
-
A.
partOfJudgingPanelWith
Indicates that two or more entities serve together as members of the same judging panel.
-
B.
judgesAre
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as a judge or evaluator of another entity.
-
C.
judgedBy
Indicates that one entity evaluates, assesses, or forms an opinion about another entity, often in an official or critical capacity.
-
D.
judgesMayBe
Indicates that certain individuals can serve in the role of judges under specified conditions or classifications.
-
E.
judgesSelectedWithParticipationOf
Indicates that the selection of judges occurred with the involvement or participation of a specified party or entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50e30748190b186824a206d39b9 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e72711be9481909f16107b71d3500a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5f6027c248190a170a36612bd337e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3 p.m.