Triple
T21152515
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Big Bear |
E521226
|
entity |
| Predicate | stanceOnTreaties |
P143080
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reluctant to sign without fair conditions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reluctant to sign without fair conditions | Statement: [Big Bear, stanceOnTreaties, reluctant to sign without fair conditions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stanceOnTreaties Context triple: [Big Bear, stanceOnTreaties, reluctant to sign without fair conditions]
-
A.
roleInTreaties
Indicates the specific capacity, function, or position an entity holds within the context of one or more treaties.
-
B.
treatyConstraint
Indicates that an entity is subject to limitations, obligations, or conditions imposed by a treaty or formal international agreement.
-
C.
resultOfTreaties
Indicates that something exists, occurs, or holds true as a consequence or outcome of one or more treaties.
-
D.
stanceOnAuthority
Indicates an entity’s attitude, position, or level of support or opposition toward authority or authoritative control.
-
E.
hasTreatySettlementWith
Indicates the existence of a formal treaty-based agreement or settlement between two parties.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50d1ea481909c07e63c3ead9316 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e7240275b481908748c0e3f187ed34 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5f5f8a5bc819081918c7fa8e4496d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5f993240c8190847c0b08e65726c8 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:58 p.m.