Triple
T21142816
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gujarat princely states |
E520974
|
entity |
| Predicate | includedState |
P11085
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Savantwadi State |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Savantwadi State | Statement: [Gujarat princely states, includedState, Savantwadi State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Savantwadi State Context triple: [Gujarat princely states, includedState, Savantwadi State]
-
A.
Sawantwadi State
chosen
Sawantwadi State was a former princely state in western India, ruled by the Sawant Bhonsle dynasty and located in what is now the Sindhudurg district of Maharashtra.
-
B.
Rajkot State
Rajkot State was a princely state in western India historically ruled by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
-
C.
Nandod State
Nandod State was a former princely state in British India, later more widely known as Rajpipla State, located in present-day Gujarat.
-
D.
Malpur State
Malpur State was a former princely state in western India, located in what is now Gujarat’s Sabarkantha region.
-
E.
Indore State
Indore State was a princely state in central India during the British Raj, centered around the city of Indore and ruled by the Holkar dynasty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50c6a848190a4e525a77a319b8a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e723fad02c8190a8e9fb82f0491642 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:57 p.m.