Triple
T21142762
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mahi Kantha Agency |
E520973
|
entity |
| Predicate | hadPrincelyState |
P74995
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Devgadh Baria State |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Devgadh Baria State | Statement: [Mahi Kantha Agency, hadPrincelyState, Devgadh Baria State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Devgadh Baria State Context triple: [Mahi Kantha Agency, hadPrincelyState, Devgadh Baria State]
-
A.
Devgadh Baria State
chosen
Devgadh Baria State was a princely state in British India, located in present-day Gujarat and ruled by local Rajput chiefs under indirect colonial administration.
-
B.
Narsinghgarh State
Narsinghgarh State was a former princely state in central India, historically ruled by local royalty under British suzerainty.
-
C.
Patdi State
Patdi State was a former princely state in western India historically governed by the Rajput Jhala dynasty.
-
D.
Santrampur State
Santrampur State was a former princely state in British India, located in what is now the state of Gujarat.
-
E.
Samthar State
Samthar State was a former princely state in colonial India, located in what is now Uttar Pradesh and ruled by a local dynasty under British suzerainty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50c6a848190a4e525a77a319b8a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e723fad02c8190a8e9fb82f0491642 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:57 p.m.