Triple
T21142761
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mahi Kantha Agency |
E520973
|
entity |
| Predicate | hadPrincelyState |
P74995
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sunth State |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sunth State | Statement: [Mahi Kantha Agency, hadPrincelyState, Sunth State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sunth State Context triple: [Mahi Kantha Agency, hadPrincelyState, Sunth State]
-
A.
Keonthal State
Keonthal State was a small princely state in the Himalayan region of British India, historically associated with the Simla Hill States.
-
B.
Bija State
Bija State was a small princely state in colonial India that formed part of the Simla Hill States group in the Himalayan region.
-
C.
Sant State
chosen
Sant State was a small princely state in colonial India that formed part of the Rewa Kantha Agency under British rule.
-
D.
Rohilla state
Rohilla state was an 18th-century Afghan-ruled polity in northern India, centered in the Rohilkhand region and governed by Rohilla Pashtun chiefs.
-
E.
Cutch State
Cutch State was a princely state in western India, centered in the Kutch (Kachchh) region of present-day Gujarat and ruled historically by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b50c6a848190a4e525a77a319b8a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e723fad02c8190a8e9fb82f0491642 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 2:57 p.m.